#Sony vegas movie studio hd platinum 11 fast render settings mp4
#Sony vegas movie studio hd platinum 11 fast render settings full
#Sony vegas movie studio hd platinum 11 fast render settings trial

#Sony vegas movie studio hd platinum 11 fast render settings mp4

mp4 video (required for iTunes video podcast) with the best settings on everything I have my 6 minute video taking up a whopping 700MB - which of course is far too large for this purpose and unmanageable. As i render out I have tried a number of different variations and combinations in the settings, to try and have a much smaller file than I start out with, and want to ideally retain most of the high quality in the video.

#Sony vegas movie studio hd platinum 11 fast render settings full

I bought a Sony HDR SR11E HD Camcorder and some extras (Rode Stereo mic, Sony 20W light etc) and also Sony Vegas Studio Platinum 9 for editing, which I am getting to grips with in part(!) but am having problems with the final results I need.Д«asically I record the video in full 1920 HD on the camcorder in AVCHD (.mts files) to ensure the highest quality of raw file possible, and drop it into Sony Vegas to edit/compile my video along with some other music and text etc. I joined up here recently, and some of you helped me out to get the relevant kit together I needed to compile a high quality video podcast I will be doing soon. The very fact that PrE has been giving the user options and control and at the same time makes it easy for novices over the years, is good enough reason for me to continuously go for it.Hi again guys and a very Happy New year to you all. And this is no different from PrE10, 9, 8, 7. I can assure you that the quality of finished output has and will depend on the combination of choice of the file (it's properties), the project setting (that is automatic - again!), the export preset resolution and frame rate (choose this as close as the original for best results) and the bit rate (higher is better - mostly). If he means rendering (The one where you hit 'Enter' on the timeline), the format is and has been 'All-I-Frame-MPEG2' - that is Fixed. The export presets can be chosen immaterial of the input videos/timeline. 'Rendering is limited to the original format.' What does he mean? If he meant export, I can again confidently say that you can export the same AVCHD file to NTSC DV Standard, WMV (WMV9), QuickTime (MOV wrapper) and multiple other formats.

Same file size and same bit rate, just to confirm. I exported it to a AVCHD-1920x1080-30p preset and I found it to be just as good as it was in PrE10.

In my tests I find that the render quality has no impact on the exported quality. The ones under Publish/Share tab in PrE11. but you know what? I don't think the reviewer is even looking at this. Then I noticed an option in the preferences where they have given the option to change the render quality and hence speed back to the Full Quality - Slower Speed. To get a preview of that this quickly is a good feature. It is done only to get an idea of what it looks like and is in no way related to how the exported output will look like. I find that verrrrry convenient, because when someone does rendering, it is because they want to have a quick look at how the composition looks like with their effects, titles, transitions, PiPs etc. What I noticed was that the rendering happened very quickly and the rendered file was 1/2 the height and 1/2 the width. I also added Guassian Blur to get it to need render (It used to be a Red line till PrE10, it is Yellowish now.).

#Sony vegas movie studio hd platinum 11 fast render settings trial

I have just downloaded the trial version and have done 'rendering' and 'export' and so I have no clue what he is talking about!! I tried an AVCHD clip and changed the opacity so that it requires rendering. This is only slightly better than the outright dubious ones by some weirdos in the previous releases!!

ДЄnother season, another review, and again far from the facts. Unfortunately, it appears that Instant HD Advanced has been discountinued. One must test with their footage, and with their eyes, to determine if the results are satisfactory. For some users, programs, like Instant HD, DO create acceptable results, but for others, it is not good. They might know IT subjects, but when it comes to processing pixels, they appear to come up very short.ДЇor upscaling from SD to HD, about the best that one can do, is to use a program, like Red Giant's Magic Bullet Instant HD (there are a few others too), but as the quality will never be equal to HD, so the editor needs to decide if the quality is acceptable, or not. I do not know that reviewer, but many seem to have no clue, when it concerns digital Video, and digital Still Images. It is the same with digital Still Images. Upscaling is ALWAYS going to degrade the Video, as one is creating pixels, where none existed.